Consider Ethical Questions of 'Designer Babies'
By Elizabeth M. Meade,
The Morning Call
| 03. 10. 2014
A recent
New York Times article (Feb. 25) on a new fertility procedure that involves using the genetic material of three people to create a baby does a very good job of outlining the major ethical challenges posed by the technique.
The procedure is intended to produce children free of certain genetic defects, by replacing the mitochondria of the egg with the mitochondria of a donor who is free of the genetic defect. It could potentially be a godsend to families who risk passing certain catastrophic genetic defects on to their children. But, as The Times article rightly points out, it raises the ethical questions of whether we should be designing our children to be free of whatever we consider to be defects.
"Designer babies," as they are often called, represent both the best and worst of our understanding of parenthood. Several techniques already allow us to prevent passing genetic defects on to the next generation.
For years, fertility clinics have been able to screen embryos for genetic defects before implanting them; in some cases, halting or slowing the prevalence...
Related Articles
It’s been a busy couple of months in biopolitics, with developments in the US, UK, China, Japan, and implicitly on Mars. Time for a brief roundup.
• • •
Bioethics needs an update
The National Research Act is now 50 years old. It was signed into law on July 12, 1974, as a direct response to publicity about the 1932 “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male.” The Hastings Bioethics Forum celebrated its anniversary with an...
Image courtesy National Human Genome Research Institute
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is supposed to encourage effective medical advances while also ensuring that patients and research subjects are protected. This dual mandate demands tricky judgment calls that are made more difficult by outside pressures of several kinds, political, judicial, and especially commercial. This April story at Bloomberg examines one deeply troubling pattern of regulatory capture:
Americans Are Paying Billions to Take Drugs That Don’t Work
Companies are increasingly...
By Elizabeth Chuck, NBC News | 07.09.2024
A Netflix docuseries has put a spotlight on the unregulated world of sperm donation, particularly the lack of stopgap measures that might prevent donors who have been banned by one country from simply going elsewhere to donate more.
Released earlier...
By Amanda Becker and Shefali Luthra, The 19th | 07.08.2024
Image by Duke University Archives from Flickr
Republicans have adopted a slate of policy positions ahead of next week’s convention that does not call for a federal legislative abortion ban, but opens the door to establishing fetal personhood.
The Republican...