Alarmed by Recent Events, Scientists Speak Out Against DIY Gene Therapy
By Kristen V. Brown,
Gizmodo
| 12. 11. 2017
It seems hard to fathom that scientific progress has advanced to a point where it’s suddenly possible for people to undertake something as complicated as gene therapy outside the safety and confines of a well-funded lab, but it has. In just the past few months we’ve seen not one, but two examples of people pursuing unregulated gene therapy. That’s right, people are genetically modifying their bodies in DIY labs and friend’s apartments.
Now, the largest organization of scientists who work in gene and cell therapy have come out against DIY gene therapies. A statement from the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy comes on the heels of a stern warning against DIY gene therapy from the US Food and Drug Administration. For years, when it came to biohacking, regulators and establishment science have mainly looked the other way. That seems to be changing.
“As the largest professional society representing gene and cell therapy in the world, ASGCT does not support the practice of unregulated gene therapies because such procedures are potentially dangerous and highly unlikely to provide therapeutic...
Related Articles
By Peter Wehling, Tino Plümecke, and Isabelle Bartram
| 03.26.2025
This article was originally published as “Soziogenomik und polygene Scores” in issue 272 (February 2025) of the German-language journal Gen-ethischer Informationsdienst (GID); translated by the authors.
In mid-November 2024, the British organization Hope not Hate published its investigative research ‘Inside the Eugenics Revival’. In addition to documentating an active international “race research” network, the investigation also brought to light the existence of a US start-up that offers eugenic embryo selection. Heliospect Genomics aims to enable wealthy couples to...
After almost 20 years of publicity stunts and dubious claims, we may not have 23andMe to kick around anymore. The company has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The stock has collapsed to about 2% of its peak value. CEO and co-founder Anne Wojcicki has quit (though she may be baaack) and the company’s future, if any, depends on its DNA database.
Note to customers of the company: Get Out. Cybersecurity expert Adrianus Warmenhoven told the Associated Press...
By ACLU Northern California
| 03.21.2025
In a long-standing lawsuit, the ACLU, on behalf of partner organizations and an individual taxpayer, is challenging the state of California for its retention of genetic samples and profiles from people arrested but never convicted of a felony.
The complaint...
By Loren Johnston, Portland Press Herald | 03.15.2025