Biopolitics, Mythic Science, and Progressive Values
By Marcy Darnovsky,
Progress in Bioethics: Science, Policy and Politics; edited by Jonathan D. Moreno and Sam Berger (The MIT Press, 2010)
| 10. 16. 2009
When bioethical deliberation confronts human biotechnologies, it often faces novel questions that recent technical developments have conjured into existence. Many of these biotechnology-related situations are both socially consequential and, at least in some respects, unprecedented in human experience. After spending its first years considering these issues largely as a scholarly endeavor with practical applications in human research and medical practice, bioethics in recent years has ventured far beyond academic and clinical settings.
Among the bioethical issues that have of late become topical are cloning and stem cell research; regulation of the assisted reproduction industry; "designer babies" and the prospect of a market-driven "techno-eugenics;" sex selection and disability de-selection; surrogacy and reproductive tourism; patents on life and markets in kidneys, eggs, and other human tissue. Formerly the province of philosophers, physicians, and lawyers, these topics are now frequently discussed in mainstream media, popular culture and electoral politics. They are matters of interest to entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, and global industries. They have captured the attention of policy makers, political consultants, and candidates; of philosophers, ministers, and rabbis. They are subjects for social...
Related Articles
By Tania Fabo, Truthout | 02.28.2026
The reproductive tech company Orchid recently launched a genetic test that promises a whole genome sequencing report for embryos. It is the first such test commercially available to couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and claims to detect things like...
By Pete Shanks
| 02.27.2026
Last month, we published “The Shameful Legacy of Tuskegee” which focused on a proposed experiment in Guinea-Bissau. The study’s plan echoed the notorious Tuskegee disaster, withholding safe, effective vaccines against hepatitis B from some newborns while inoculating others. It was to be financed by the U.S. but performed by a controversial Danish team. That project provoked a multi-national outcry, leading to a remarkable response from the World Health Organization:
WHO has significant concerns regarding the study’s scientific...
By Kiana Jackson and Shannon Stubblefield, New Disabled South | 02.09.2026
"MC0_8230" via Wikimedia Commons licensed under CC by 2.0
This report documents a deliberate assault on disabled people in the United States. Not an accident. Not a series of bureaucratic missteps. An assault that has been coordinated across agencies...
By Scott Solomon, The MIT Press Reader | 02.12.2026
Chris Mason is a man in a hurry.
“Sometimes walking from the subway to the lab takes too long, so I’ll start running,” he told me over breakfast at a bistro near his home in Brooklyn on a crisp...