Biotech Reels Over Patent Ruling
By Erika Check-Hayden,
Nature News
| 07. 08. 2014
Untitled Document
Guidelines that forbid patents on a wide array of natural products, phenomena and principles have many in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries worried about the future of their business.
The rules, issued by the US Patent and Trademark Office in March, are open to public comment until 31 July and are reactions to two recent decisions by the US Supreme Court. In March 2012, the court ruled against Prometheus Laboratories in San Diego, California, saying that the company could not patent metabolite levels used to guide drug dosing. Then, in June 2013, the court rejected a patent claim by Myriad Genetics of Salt Lake City, Utah, on DNA sequences linked to breast cancer, opening the door for firms to develop genetic tests of breast-cancer risk. In both cases, the court based its decision on a section of patent code that forbids patenting “laws of nature, natural phenomena and abstract ideas”. The guidance now states that patentable inventions must be “significantly different” from any natural product.
The patent office has decided that because the decisions in these cases built...
Related Articles
By Jim Thomas, Scan the Horizon | 11.19.2024
It’s the wee hours of 2nd November 2024 in Cali, Colombia. In a large UN negotiating hall Colombian Environment Minister Susana Muhamed has slammed down the gavel on a decision that should send a jolt through the AI policy world. ...
By Ewan Bolton, The Telegraph | 11.12.2024
Fertility agencies offering embryo selection for IVF and surrogacy have been accused of promoting eugenics and misleading consumers about the power of genetic screening.
Some American clinics claim they can “rank” embryos for IVF using Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Polygenic...
By Ned Pagliarulo, BioPharmaDive | 11.05.2024
A medicine built around a more precise form of CRISPR gene editing appeared to work as designed in its first clinical trial test, developer Beam Therapeutics said Tuesday. But the death of a trial participant could renew concerns about an older...
By Fyodor Urnov, The CRIPSR Journal | 10.18.2024
The field of clinical gene editing has a bona fide crisis on its hands—a crisis that has to, and can be, promptly resolved.
An outside observer of our field might be surprised by this and say—what crisis? The first...