Britian has jumped the gun on gene editing
By Donna Dickenson,
Telegraph [UK]
| 02. 02. 2016
Untitled Document
For the first time Britain’s Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has granted researchers permission to use a new “gene editing” technique called Crispr/Cas9 to modify human embryos. This is despite a global summit held last December by the National Academies of Science in Washington which warned that, when it comes to this powerful new technique, no nation should go it alone. Other countries such as the United States are just as advanced as Britain in gene editing – indeed, the techniques authorised by HFEA were partly developed in America. But these nations are, rightly, being more cautious in using it.
Why? Their objections do not rest on religion or Luddite opposition to new technology. And it is not gene editing per se – they have fewer concerns about the technique’s use to correct genetic problems in individual living patients. But around the world, expert scientists and bioethicists are worried about its use to modify human embryos. If such embryos are reimplanted in the womb and born, genetic modifications would not be confined to them, but passed down...
Related Articles
By Fyodor Urnov, Time | 08.12.2024
After a lifetime in the field of epigenetics, and nearly 20 years after my colleagues and I coined the term “genome editing,” I will be the first to admit that describing the “epigenome”—a marvelous biological process that guides...
By Joy Zhang, Progress Educational Trust | 08.12.2024
What do China's new ethical guidlines tell us about the country's changing attitude to human genome editing? Professor Joy Zhang reads between the lines...
Recently, China's National Science and Technology Ethics Committee introduced a new set of ethics guidelines on...
By Priyanka Runwal, Chemical and Engineering News | 08.05.2024
Saritee Sanodiya, 26, has spent countless days wondering if she’ll ever live a “normal” life. Growing up, Sanodiya often missed school, frequenting the hospital for sudden, life-threatening drops in her hemoglobin levels and excruciating pain in her joints. High fever...
It’s been a busy couple of months in biopolitics, with developments in the US, UK, China, Japan, and implicitly on Mars. Time for a brief roundup.
• • •
Bioethics needs an update
The National Research Act is now 50 years old. It was signed into law on July 12, 1974, as a direct response to publicity about the 1932 “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male.” The Hastings Bioethics Forum celebrated its anniversary with an...