China’s ethics guidelines – A new era for human genome editing?
By Joy Zhang,
BioNews
| 08. 12. 2024
What do China’s new ethical guidlines tell us about the country's changing attitude to human genome editing? Professor Joy Zhang reads between the lines...
Recently, China’s National Science and Technology Ethics Committee introduced a new set of ethics guidelines on human genome editing (see BioNews 1247). The guidelines are at least the fourth national level iteration of China's ban on human reproductive genome editing in recent years (following its updates on the Crime Law and Civil Code in 2020, and the ethical review measures in 2023).
It is also the first major publication of the national Ethics Committee since its administrative function was revoked in 2023. Instead of being an ‘advisory and coordinating organ’ (yishi xietiao jigou) of the State Council, it is currently categorised as an ‘academic expert committee’.
As someone who has been researching China's life science policies, I see the new guidelines as a clear indication that the Chinese government is poised to enter a new phase of supporting human genome editing research. But questions remain about whether the latest guidelines will prevent past...
Related Articles
By Peter Wehling, Tino Plümecke, and Isabelle Bartram
| 03.26.2025
This article was originally published as “Soziogenomik und polygene Scores” in issue 272 (February 2025) of the German-language journal Gen-ethischer Informationsdienst (GID); translated by the authors.
In mid-November 2024, the British organization Hope not Hate published its investigative research ‘Inside the Eugenics Revival’. In addition to documentating an active international “race research” network, the investigation also brought to light the existence of a US start-up that offers eugenic embryo selection. Heliospect Genomics aims to enable wealthy couples to...
By Dalton Conley, The New York Times | 03.13.2025
Since Francis Galton coined the phrase “nature versus nurture” 150 years ago, the debate about what makes us who we are has dominated the human sciences.
Do genes determine our destiny, as the hereditarians would say? Or do we enter...
By Jamie Ducharme, TIME | 03.06.2025
After struggling for eight years to have a baby, Shannon Petersen and her husband decided to try in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 2022. Their fertility doctor recommended a test that sounded like exactly what they needed. It promised to help...
By Jason Wilson, The Guardian | 03.03.2025
A natalist conference featuring speakers including self-described eugenicists and promoters of race science, apparently including the man behind a previously pseudonymous race-science influencer account, and the founder of a startup offering IQ screening for IVF embryos, will be held at...