Cloning and the Debate on Abortion
By Nigel Cameron and Lori Andrews,
Chicago Tribune
| 08. 08. 2001
Italian fertility specialist Severino Antinori has announced
that he will begin human cloning in early 2002. Two hundred
couples desperately seeking to create children will become human
guinea pigs in a massive experiment. The odds are not in their
favor. In animals, cloning currently only results in a successful
pregnancy 3 to 5 percent of the time. And, even in those rare
instances, many of the resulting offspring suffer. One-third
die shortly before or right after birth. Other cloned animals
seem perfectly healthy at first and then suffer heart and blood
vessel problems, underdeveloped lungs, diabetes, immune system
deficiencies and severe growth abnormalities.
If an infectious disease were killing one-third of human infants,
we would declare it a public health emergency. We certainly
wouldn’t set up a clinic to enable it to happen. Yet despite
these grave risks, only five states have laws banning human
cloning. There is no federal law on the subject yet. Despite
widespread public opposition to human cloning, various researchers
and biotech companies have so far prevented the passage of such
a law.
This summer, however...
Related Articles
By Carly Mallenbaum, Axios [cites Emily Galpern] | 03.29.2026
More Americans are turning to surrogacy to build their families, as the practice becomes more common and more publicly discussed.
Why it matters: As surrogacy becomes more visible and accessible, ethical, legal and cultural tensions become harder to ignore...
By Carly Mallenbaum, Axios [cites Surrogacy360] | 03.29.2026
Without a federal law, surrogacy in the U.S. is governed by a patchwork of state regulations/
Why it matters: Confusing, varied local rules can determine everything from whether agreements are legally binding to who is recognized as a parent at...
Cathy Tie seems to be good at starting businesses but not so dedicated to maintaining them. CGS, like many others, first heard of her thanks to Caiwei Chen and Antonio Regalado in MIT Technology Review, May 2025, as the partner (perhaps bride) of the notorious Chinese scientist He Jiankui, described in the headline as “China’s Frankenstein.” He prefers “Chinese Darwin.” She ran his Twitter account for a while, contributing such gems as:
Get in luddite, we’re going gene editing...
By Jessica Riskin, Los Ángeles Review of Books | 03.24.2026
This is the second part of the 14th installment in the Legacies of Eugenics series, which features essays by leading thinkers devoted to exploring the history of eugenics and the ways it shapes our present. You can read the...