Cloning and the Debate on Abortion
By Nigel Cameron and Lori Andrews,
Chicago Tribune
| 08. 08. 2001
Italian fertility specialist Severino Antinori has announced
that he will begin human cloning in early 2002. Two hundred
couples desperately seeking to create children will become human
guinea pigs in a massive experiment. The odds are not in their
favor. In animals, cloning currently only results in a successful
pregnancy 3 to 5 percent of the time. And, even in those rare
instances, many of the resulting offspring suffer. One-third
die shortly before or right after birth. Other cloned animals
seem perfectly healthy at first and then suffer heart and blood
vessel problems, underdeveloped lungs, diabetes, immune system
deficiencies and severe growth abnormalities.
If an infectious disease were killing one-third of human infants,
we would declare it a public health emergency. We certainly
wouldn’t set up a clinic to enable it to happen. Yet despite
these grave risks, only five states have laws banning human
cloning. There is no federal law on the subject yet. Despite
widespread public opposition to human cloning, various researchers
and biotech companies have so far prevented the passage of such
a law.
This summer, however...
Related Articles
By Miranda Bryant, The Guardian | 08.27.2025
Denmark’s prime minister, Mette Frederiksen, has apologised for the first time for the forced contraception scandal in which thousands of Greenlandic girls and women were fitted with contraceptive coils without their permission or knowledge.
Describing it as “systemic discrimination” against...
By Carter Sherman, The Guardian | 08.23.2025
For Erica L and her husband, in-vitro fertilization was the “nuclear option”.
After two years of trying to conceive, Erica and her husband had no idea why they could not have a baby. Doctors said only that they had “unexplained...
By Annika Inampudi, Science | 08.01.2025
In June, Sara* received a message asking whether she wanted to continue to participate in a massive, multicenter research project led by scientists at Aarhus University in Denmark. The iPsych study, the message said, had sequenced her genetic data from...
By Riley Beggin and Jeff Stein, The Washington Post | 08.03.2025
The White House does not plan to require health insurers to provide coverage for in vitro fertilization services, two people with knowledge of internal discussions said, even though the idea was one of President Donald Trump’s key campaign pledges.
Last...