Criticizing a Scientist’s Work Isn’t Bullying. It’s Science.
By Simine Vazire,
Slate
| 10. 24. 2017
The New York Times Magazine story on Amy Cuddy brings up extremely important problems in science. But we cannot equate criticism with harassment.
When teaching research methods to first-year college students, I used to tell them that scientists try to prove themselves wrong. But last year, I took that out—it felt too dishonest. At its best, science is about figuring out where we’re wrong, about constant course correction.
Unfortunately, the pressures society has placed on scientists have made it almost impossible for us to admit when we’re wrong. We’re rewarded—by funding agencies, by prestigious scientific journals, by the media—for cherry-picking and polishing our results to make them look as shiny as possible. “Groundbreaking” discoveries are often the standard for getting a job or getting promoted. When the stakes are that high, it’s easy for scientists to start seeing what we need to see—to convince ourselves that our embellished findings are rock solid because we have to. What’s worse, there is little incentive for scientists to challenge and correct each other. Doing the hard work of checking each other’s...
Related Articles
By Peter Wehling, Tino Plümecke, and Isabelle Bartram
| 03.26.2025
This article was originally published as “Soziogenomik und polygene Scores” in issue 272 (February 2025) of the German-language journal Gen-ethischer Informationsdienst (GID); translated by the authors.
In mid-November 2024, the British organization Hope not Hate published its investigative research ‘Inside the Eugenics Revival’. In addition to documentating an active international “race research” network, the investigation also brought to light the existence of a US start-up that offers eugenic embryo selection. Heliospect Genomics aims to enable wealthy couples to...
After almost 20 years of publicity stunts and dubious claims, we may not have 23andMe to kick around anymore. The company has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The stock has collapsed to about 2% of its peak value. CEO and co-founder Anne Wojcicki has quit (though she may be baaack) and the company’s future, if any, depends on its DNA database.
Note to customers of the company: Get Out. Cybersecurity expert Adrianus Warmenhoven told the Associated Press...
By ACLU Northern California
| 03.21.2025
In a long-standing lawsuit, the ACLU, on behalf of partner organizations and an individual taxpayer, is challenging the state of California for its retention of genetic samples and profiles from people arrested but never convicted of a felony.
The complaint...
By Loren Johnston, Portland Press Herald | 03.15.2025