Crossing An Ethical Boundary
By Marcy Darnovsky,
The Journal of Life Sciences
| 05. 19. 2008
What prompted the recent headlines about genetically-modified human embryos? Why did a brief account of an experiment at Cornell University, presented last fall at an American Society for Reproductive Medicine conference and then published without fanfare in its journal Fertility and Sterility, suddenly make news around the world?
The work in question involved transferring a gene that codes for a fluorescing protein into a non-viable human embryo, and showing that all the cells in the embryo glowed after three days of cell division. As one of the research team's members later acknowledged, it was the first time that scientists are known to have created a genetically-modified human embryo.
Strangely, the study stayed beneath the public and media radar for months. It was brought to the attention of the UK's Sunday Times by Dr. David King, director of the British organization Human Genetics Alert, who came across it recently while reading a document prepared by the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority. The story ran in the May 11 Sunday Times and was then picked up by the Associated Press and...
Related Articles
By Ian Sample, The Guardian | 07.04.2024
Biological models of human embryos that can develop heartbeats, spinal cords and other distinctive features will be governed by a code of practice in Britain to ensure that researchers work on them responsibly.
Made from stem cells, they mimic, to...
By Kevin Davies, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News | 06.27.2024
Physician-scientist Matthew Porteus, MD, PhD, has been a mainstay in the genome editing field for more than two decades. He trained at Stanford University Medical School before completing his residency and hematology/oncology fellowship at Boston Children’s Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute...
By Peter Aldhous, Scientific American | 07.02.2024
In June a notice posted on the website of the journal Nature set a new scientific record. It withdrew what is now the most highly cited research paper ever to be retracted.
The study, published in 2002 by Catherine Verfaillie...
By Robert F. Service, Science | 07.04.2024
Image by Ed Uthman from Flickr
Last year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved two gene therapy procedures that can treat and, in some cases essentially cure sickle cell disease, a genetic blood disorder that causes pain and...