The Dangerous Resurgence of “Bad Genes” Language
By Susan A. Nolan and Michael Kimball,
Psychology Today
| 10. 30. 2024
In 2021, the American Psychological Association (APA) published a resolution: Apology to People of Color for APA’s Role in Promoting, Perpetuating, and Failing to Challenge Racism, Racial Discrimination, and Human Hierarchy in the U.S. In this document, the APA outlined the role that White male psychologists played in bolstering White supremacy and systemic racism through the eugenics movement in the early 1900s.
According to the National Human Genome Research Institute, eugenics “is the scientifically inaccurate theory that humans can be improved through selective breeding of populations.” This scientific racism uses the dangerous illogic of eugenics to provide credibility for long-debunked ideas that White Europeans are genetically superior to “non-[W]hite people whose social and economic status have been historically marginalized.” This unscientific sleight of hand requires discussion of ideas—about the “good genes” that White people supposedly have and the “bad genes” that others supposedly have—that are not supported by research or evidence.
Emma Wolverton, Eugenics, and “Feeblemindedness”
Science journalist Carl Zimmer traces the history of eugenics in the United States in his powerful book, She Has Her Mother’s...
Related Articles
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...
By Hannah Devlin, The Guardian | 12.06.2025
Couples undergoing IVF in the UK are exploiting an apparent legal loophole to rank their embryos based on genetic predictions of IQ, height and health, the Guardian has learned.
The controversial screening technique, which scores embryos based on their DNA...
By Vardit Ravitsky, The Hastings Center | 12.04.2025
Embryo testing is advancing fast—but how far is too far? How and where do we draw the line between preventing disease and selecting for “desirable” traits? What are the ethical implications for parents, children, clinicians, and society at large? These...
By Grace Won, KQED Forum [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...