Editorial: California shouldn’t keep DNA from hundreds of thousands of innocent people
By Chronicle Editorial Board,
San Francisco Chronicle [cites CGS' Marcy Darnovsky]
| 12. 14. 2018
California is being sued over its DNA collection practices, and the only thing that’s surprising is how long it took. In 2004, state voters passed Proposition 69, which requires authorities to collect DNA from anyone arrested for a felony. The person’s DNA profile is then uploaded to the national Combined DNA Index System.
Police and other law enforcement agencies around the country love the database, because it allows them to share information, generate leads, and connect the dots between crimes.
These are important functions, and DNA databases have been a breakthrough tool for law enforcement. In California, police agencies have used DNA databases to find the perpetrators of horrific crimes like the Gypsy Hill Killings.
But as we pointed out in 2004, there’s always been one huge flaw with Prop. 69: the size of the net it casts.
Prop. 69 requires DNA collection for anyone who’s been arrested for a felony, not convicted of a felony.
What that effectively means is that law enforcement agencies are allowed to keep the genetic profiles of thousands of people who have...
Related Articles
By Caroline Kitchener, The New York Times | 08.21.2025
Less than two weeks after an Alabama Supreme Court decision upended in vitro fertilization in the state and prompted a national backlash, over 100 conservative congressional staff members and I.V.F. skeptics crammed into a meeting room a few blocks from...
By Carter Sherman, The Guardian | 08.23.2025
For Erica L and her husband, in-vitro fertilization was the “nuclear option”.
After two years of trying to conceive, Erica and her husband had no idea why they could not have a baby. Doctors said only that they had “unexplained...
By Annika Inampudi, Science | 08.01.2025
In June, Sara* received a message asking whether she wanted to continue to participate in a massive, multicenter research project led by scientists at Aarhus University in Denmark. The iPsych study, the message said, had sequenced her genetic data from...
By Riley Beggin and Jeff Stein, The Washington Post | 08.03.2025
The White House does not plan to require health insurers to provide coverage for in vitro fertilization services, two people with knowledge of internal discussions said, even though the idea was one of President Donald Trump’s key campaign pledges.
Last...
