Editorial: Oversight at Pitt: Whither due diligence?
By Pittsburgh Tribune-Review,
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
| 04. 26. 2006
A superstar at the University of Pittsburgh was not subjected to commonsensical oversight by his institution.
Gerald Schatten was senior author on a paper describing patient-matched stem cells created through human embryonic cloning.
The research, conducted by Hwang Woo-Suk in South Korea, later was proven an extraordinary fraud.
It is clear Pitt's standards were substandard. The Institutional Review Board took Mr. Schatten at his word that none of the women whose eggs were harvested was identifiable to the researchers. The board, it appeared, did not have jurisdiction.
But it did.
South Korean law requires that families of women who donated eggs would have priority for any resulting treatments. So the researchers must have a way of identifying the donors. Actually, Hwang drove one, a lab assistant, to the hospital for the egg extraction. She later worked in Schatten's Pitt lab.
Strict ethical oversight protects the subjects' privacy and safety. Harvesting eggs is dangerous and questions persist whether the women gave informed consent.
Schatten may have believed all was well until it became impossible to say so with a straight face...
Related Articles
By Elizabeth Chuck, NBC News | 07.09.2024
A Netflix docuseries has put a spotlight on the unregulated world of sperm donation, particularly the lack of stopgap measures that might prevent donors who have been banned by one country from simply going elsewhere to donate more.
Released earlier...
By Rachel Clayton, ABC News | 07.08.2024
In her early 30s, Michelle Galea wasn't convinced motherhood was for her.
"I didn't know if I wanted a child or if society was telling me I should have a child right now," she said.
But as she watched two...
By Amanda Becker and Shefali Luthra, The 19th | 07.08.2024
Image by Duke University Archives from Flickr
Republicans have adopted a slate of policy positions ahead of next week’s convention that does not call for a federal legislative abortion ban, but opens the door to establishing fetal personhood.
The Republican...
By Beth Duff-Brown, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research | 07.12.2024
The debate over in vitro fertilization (IVF) has become a hot-button policy and political issue, despite the medical procedure to help people become pregnant having been mainstream in the United States for nearly half a century.
The Alabama Supreme Court ...