Ethics changes notwithstanding, creating genetically modified babies is still illegal in SA
By Tamsin Metelerkamp [cites CGS' Katie Hasson],
Daily Maverick
| 11. 18. 2024
The National Health Research Ethics Council (NHREC) has confirmed that heritable human genome editing (HHGE) remains illegal in South Africa, after changes in the latest version of the South African Ethics in Health Research Guidelines sparked concern among researchers that the country was poised to become the first to explicitly permit the use of genome editing to create genetically modified children.
The guidelines were issued in May, but the new section on HHGE appeared to go largely unnoticed until an article in The Conversation in October — “South Africa amended its research guidelines to allow for heritable human genome editing” — brought it into the spotlight.
In a statement, the chairperson of the NHREC, Professor Penelope Engel-Hills, acknowledged that the wording in the guidelines may have caused some confusion and “unnecessary alarm”, but stated that “reading in” a permissive approach concerning heritable human genome editing was “unconvincing”.
“Firstly, the National Health Research Ethics Council of South Africa (NHREC) wishes to clarify that neither the National Health Act, nor the 2024 National Guidelines on Ethics in Health Research, legalise...
Related Articles
By Jessica Hamzelou, MIT Technology Review | 01.13.2025
Lisa Holligan already had two children when she decided to try for another baby. Her first two pregnancies had come easily. But for some unknown reason, the third didn’t. Holligan and her husband experienced miscarriage after miscarriage after miscarriage.
Like...
By Melissa Dahl, Slate | 01.13.2025
Mia used to say she’d never do in vitro fertilization. It’s a detail that feels significant now, looking back on the three long years that she and her husband, Chris, have spent trying to conceive. “When we first started trying...
By Tatiana Giovannucci, PET | 01.13.2025
Ten pregnant women and three others with their babies were repatriated to the Philippines after being pardoned by the Royal Government of Cambodia.
The women were recruited to act as surrogates in Cambodia, and were all pregnant at the time...
By Kristen V. Brown, The Atlantic | 01.15.2025
The first time Jamie Cassidy was pregnant, the fetus had a genetic mutation so devastating that she and her husband, Brennan, decided to terminate in the second trimester. The next time they tried for a baby, they weren’t taking chances...