The FDA’s 23andMe decision will also change the rules for all at-home medical genetic testing
By Dave Gershgorn,
Quartz
| 04. 10. 2017
Doctors are losing their role as the gatekeeper of our health information, for better or worse.
Last week, the US Food and Drug Administration made a surprise announcement giving genetic testing company 23andMe clearance to sell a service that gives customers a risk analysis for 10 genetically linked diseases. It reverses a 2013 decision that cited concerns that inaccurate testing results—and potential customer misinterpretation—made for a public health threat, and builds on a 2015 agreement between the FDA and 23andMe that allowed the company to offer a test that told customers of their “carrier status” of genetic markers for certain diseases—but not assess their actual risk. This latest decision means 23andMe will again be able to provide specific risk analyses to customers, and perhaps more importantly, throws the door wide open to dozens of other companies to run out their own versions of at-home genetic risk-analysis products.
The disease risk that 23andMe offers isn’t a diagnosis; it just gives you your potential for elevated risk. For example, if a person inherited a copy of the ApoE4 gene variant from both...
Related Articles
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 11.24.2024
Gig work in childcare, nursing, and transportation; non-invasive prenatal testing; gene editing; and space expeditions can all be attributed to one mistaken, pervasive assumption: that “we can innovate our way out of the thorniest problems, including reproductive ones” (22). In Reproductive Labor and Innovation: Against the Tech Fix in an Era of Hype, feminist political theorist Jennifer Denbow demonstrates why the U.S. has put so much of its hopes, and its money, on technological “innovations”––and why that hasn’t addressed...
By Arwa Mahdawi, The Guardian | 11.19.2024
Photo "Elon Musk Presenting Tesla's Fully Autonomous Future" by Steve Jurvetson on Flickr (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
Is Elon Musk the dinner party guest from hell? It sure seems that way. Not only is the man desperate for people to...
By Colette Shade, The New Republic | 11.14.2024
Photo "Elon Musk" by Daniel Oberhaus on Flickr (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
Would Donald Trump have won reelection if not for the backing of the world’s richest man? We’ll never know. But that man, Elon Musk, gave Trump more than $130...
By Carter Sherman, The Guardian | 11.17.2024
The anti-abortion movement is ready for its comeback in 2025.
With the return of Donald Trump to the White House, complete with a Republican-dominated Congress, anti-abortion groups are unfurling ambitious lists of policies they hope to see ...