A genetic “Minority Report”: How corporate DNA testing could put us at risk
By Benjamin Winterhalter,
Salon
| 01. 26. 2014
On Nov. 22, 2013, the FDA sent a now-infamous letter to the genetic
research startup 23andMe, ordering the company to stop marketing some of
its personal DNA testing kits. In its letter, the agency told 23andMe
that it was concerned about the possibility of erroneous test results,
about false positives and false negatives. The FDA warned that false
positives – for example, being told that one has a high risk of breast
cancer when really one doesn’t – might lead customers to seek expensive
testing or medical treatment that they don’t really need. False
negatives – which are just the opposite – might lead customers to ignore
serious health problems or deviate from a prescribed treatment regime.
The company had been out of contact with the FDA since May of 2013, and
had not filed the required information to allay the bureau’s concerns.
When
word about the letter got out, the ever-ready machine of Internet
journalism whirred quickly to life. Defenders of the genetic research
firm argued that the information, if used properly and with a
physician’s supervision, is not only...
Related Articles
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 11.24.2024
Gig work in childcare, nursing, and transportation; non-invasive prenatal testing; gene editing; and space expeditions can all be attributed to one mistaken, pervasive assumption: that “we can innovate our way out of the thorniest problems, including reproductive ones” (22). In Reproductive Labor and Innovation: Against the Tech Fix in an Era of Hype, feminist political theorist Jennifer Denbow demonstrates why the U.S. has put so much of its hopes, and its money, on technological “innovations”––and why that hasn’t addressed...
By Arwa Mahdawi, The Guardian | 11.19.2024
Photo "Elon Musk Presenting Tesla's Fully Autonomous Future" by Steve Jurvetson on Flickr (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
Is Elon Musk the dinner party guest from hell? It sure seems that way. Not only is the man desperate for people to...
By Colette Shade, The New Republic | 11.14.2024
Photo "Elon Musk" by Daniel Oberhaus on Flickr (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
Would Donald Trump have won reelection if not for the backing of the world’s richest man? We’ll never know. But that man, Elon Musk, gave Trump more than $130...
By Carter Sherman, The Guardian | 11.17.2024
The anti-abortion movement is ready for its comeback in 2025.
With the return of Donald Trump to the White House, complete with a Republican-dominated Congress, anti-abortion groups are unfurling ambitious lists of policies they hope to see ...