Has change come to biology?
By John Timmer,
arts technica
| 02. 02. 2009
Stem cell research under Obama
President Obama's promise to restore science to its rightful place has raised the hopes of biologists that there will be swift action on what many view as a serious hindrance to biology: restrictions on the use of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Federal funding of hESC research has been limited to lines created before August 9th, 2001—nearly nine years ago—and most of the acceptable lines have since been found to be inappropriate for clinical research; ethical issues involving informed consent affect the remaining handful. On Tuesday, the New York Stem Cell foundation hosted a panel that discussed how a lifting of the Bush-era restrictions on hESC research is likely to change hESC research.
The panel included two members that had been part of the Obama transition team: Alta Charo, who focuses on bioethics at the University of Wisconsin Law School, and Nobel Laureate Harold Varmus of Sloan-Kettering, who is now serving on Obama's Science and Technology advisory panel. Lawrence Tabak of the NIH provided some perspective on what his agency would need to do, and Harvard's Kevin Eggan spoke as...
Related Articles
By Hamed Aleaziz, The New York Times | 08.13.2026
Immigrants at Ellis Island undergoing a medical inspection | Photo by The New York Public Library on Unsplash
In 1924, Congress sent a message to the world: We are no longer ready to take “your tired, your poor, your huddled...
What We Inherit by Sam Trejo and Daphne O. Martschenko; and Original Sin by Kathryn Paige Harden have a great deal in common, with substantial differences in style and emphasis. Both books attempt, in different ways, to show the reader just where current research into human genomics stands, where that might be going, and why the authors are interested. In short, the influence of genomic research on our societies is already large and seems likely to change them in ways...
By Dan Falk, Nautilus | 08.20.2026
The pseudoscience of eugenics, founded on the mistaken notion that nature envisions some “right” combination of genes, and that selective breeding can improve the human race, is making a comeback. While the heyday of eugenics was a century ago, the...
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross, MedPage Today | 08.18.2026
Few things evoke a greater sense of desperation than a parent seeking an experimental treatment for their child. That desperation can make even extraordinary risks seem worth taking. This dynamic has come into stark relief after Mei, a 6-year-old girl...