Human subjects research with prisoners: putting the ethical question in context
By Osagie K. Obasogie and Keramet A. Reiter,
Bioethics
| 12. 16. 2010
[Commentary]
We write in response to the conversation initiated in Volume 24.1 of Bioethics, which focused on the role of prisoners in biomedical and behavioral research. As interdisciplinary legal scholars who have researched the history, ethics, and current practices of prison research in the United States, we write to encourage further dialogue about the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) recommendations to reform current standards for prisoners' participation as human subjects. Specifically, we challenge three critical assumptions, which underlie several articles in the Bioethics special issue.
First, we challenge the idea that a risk-benefit assessment applied to prisoner participants in research is too restrictive.1 On the contrary, we argue that it is too permissive. The IOM's risk-benefit proposal – the most significant of its five main recommendations – is designed to relax current standards that categorically restrict prisoners' participation as human subjects to four narrow situations that directly benefit prisoners.2 Current policies were implemented in response to substantial abuses directly connected to prisoners' vulnerability and deplorable prison conditions; a 1976 Commission concluded that widespread research in prisons should not be...
Related Articles
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 07.11.2024
Louise Perry’s recent article in The Spectator cautions against “The quiet return of eugenics,” a threat she locates in preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic disorders. The technology is billed as a way for parents undergoing IVF to select which embryo to implant based on information about each embryo’s genetic risk factors and traits. These reports, she says, give parents “a very full picture of the adult that embryo could become”––from their child’s risk of developing different diseases to their “likely...
GATTACA was released in 1997, but — remarkably — is even more relevant now than it was then, as the technologies whose social implications it explores have developed considerably.
On Thursday, June 13, the California Film Institute presented GATTACA to a sold-out house at the Christopher B. Smith Rafael Film Center as part of their Science on Screen series. CGS Associate Director Katie Hasson offered framing for the film and participated in a Q+A discussion.
The film’s plot explicitly involves...
By Ellie Kincaid, Retraction Watch | 06.18.2024
Nature has retracted a 2002 paper from the lab of Catherine Verfaillie purporting to show a type of adult stem cell could, under certain circumstances, “contribute to most, if not all, somatic cell types.”
The retracted article, “Pluripotency of...