Aggregated News

View behind bars

Last week, the Department of Homeland Security’s Inspector General received a formal complaint(link is external) alleging that unnecessary hysterectomies(link is external) were being performed on immigrants in custody at Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Irwin County Detention center in Georgia. When systematically targeted toward a particular group, as in the case of China’s(link is external) reported treatment of Uighur Muslims(link is external), forcible sterilization meets the International Criminal Court’s definition(link is external) of genocide(link is external). The United States has a long history of using this practice(link is external) to prevent women in stigmatized groups from having children. My research finds that many Americans still support sterilizing incarcerated women.

Forced sterilization in the U.S.

Since the early 20th century, thousands of Americans(link is external) have been forcibly sterilized. Thirty-three states(link is external) had eugenics boards with the power to order sterilizations. Oregon’s board approved its final sterilization in 1981(link is external). These boards targeted disabled people(link is external) disproportionately, a practice upheld by the Supreme Court in 1927.

Research suggests this is not the only bias that existed in how these sterilizations were applied. North Carolina’s eugenics board targeted Black women at higher rates(link is external) than White women after World War...