Imagine you could select your future child based on likely intelligence. Would you?
By Philip Ball,
Prospect
| 03. 06. 2023
Imagine you’re planning to have a baby and are told there’s a method that can select the embryo to increase, by 2 per cent, the chance of them getting into a top school. Would you use it? A new survey found that more than four in 10 Americans say they would. This study of attitudes towards a technique called preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic risk (PGT-P) shows that there could be a substantial market for it if it is made available for such applications. The technology would not, say bioethicist Michelle N Meyer of Geisinger Health System in Danville, Pennsylvania, and her co-authors, just be adopted by a few “idiosyncratic individuals”, as has sometimes been suggested previously.
Of course, if you’re sensible then you will ask about the small print. How much does the process cost? Is it risky? Since it requires IVF, so that the prospective embryos can be genetically tested before implantation, would you opt for that even if it would not otherwise be necessary to conceive? But the researchers intentionally set a low bar for the 6,823...
Related Articles
By Caroline Kitchener, The New York Times | 08.21.2025
Less than two weeks after an Alabama Supreme Court decision upended in vitro fertilization in the state and prompted a national backlash, over 100 conservative congressional staff members and I.V.F. skeptics crammed into a meeting room a few blocks from...
By Carter Sherman, The Guardian | 08.23.2025
For Erica L and her husband, in-vitro fertilization was the “nuclear option”.
After two years of trying to conceive, Erica and her husband had no idea why they could not have a baby. Doctors said only that they had “unexplained...
By Ryan Cross, Endpoints News | 08.19.2025
Human eggs are incredibly rare cells. The ovary typically produces only 400 mature eggs across a woman’s life. But biologists in George Church’s lab at Harvard University — a group that’s never content with nature’s limits — just got a...
By Riley Beggin and Jeff Stein, The Washington Post | 08.03.2025
The White House does not plan to require health insurers to provide coverage for in vitro fertilization services, two people with knowledge of internal discussions said, even though the idea was one of President Donald Trump’s key campaign pledges.
Last...