Influential Scientific Journal Rips Effort to Loosen Stem Cell Research Rules
By David Jensen,
California Stem Cell Report
| 07. 05. 2016
The prestigious journal
Nature today editorialized against easing federal regulation of stem cell treatments, a major blow to the campaign by the California stem cell agency to speed such therapies to the marketplace.
The headline on the piece said,
"FDA should stand firm on stem cell treatments."
The
unsigned editorial declared that those who contend that the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is holding back "effective therapies" are peddling a false narrative. Nature declared,
"The claim that regulation is too harsh wrongly implies that the FDA is holding back therapies that work. Critics point to decades of preclinical and clinical work with stem cells and the pipelines of stem-cell treatments. With circular logic, they argue that, because the treatments have not been approved, there is something wrong with the approval system."
The $3 billion California stem cell agency has been lobbying for months for changes in FDA regulation.
Randy Mills, president of the
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine(CIRM) as the agency is formally known,
said back in December that "patients are dying" because the FDA is being "so careful...
Related Articles
By Sigal Samuel, Vox | 01.20.2025
By Shoumita Dasgupta, The Conversation | 01.13.2025
By Emily Tucker, Truthout | 01.07.2025
As Donald Trump’s return to the White House looms, dismantling the most dangerous weapons in the arsenal of executive power should be the Biden administration’s highest priority for its last days. The most obvious of these relate to the president’s...
By Jessica Hamzelou, MIT Technology Review | 01.13.2025
Lisa Holligan already had two children when she decided to try for another baby. Her first two pregnancies had come easily. But for some unknown reason, the third didn’t. Holligan and her husband experienced miscarriage after miscarriage after miscarriage.
Like...