Let people most affected by gene editing write CRISPR rules
By Jessica Hamzelou,
New Scientist
| 04. 29. 2016
Untitled Document
Who stands to benefit from – or lose out on – gene editing? Advances in our ability to tweak the human genome using CRISPR Cas-9 and similar techniques won’t only affect those at risk of genetic disorders. Women and disabled people are likely to be disproportionately affected. And people living in poor countries – who are at the greatest risk of disease – could miss out on the benefits.
These were among the points raised at a summit held by the US National Academies of Science and Medicine’s Committee on Human Gene Editing in Paris today. The committee will draw up a set of recommendations based on the questions and comments raised by the audience – a mix of scientists, ethicists and lawyers.
The CRISPR editing tool offers scientists a way to cut out sections of DNA and potentially replace them with others. Since it took the research world by storm last year, some have suggested it could be used to treat genetic disorders by precisely targeting the responsible genetic mutation. Disorders like Duchenne muscular dystrophy, which causes...
Related Articles
By Elizabeth Chuck, NBC News | 07.09.2024
A Netflix docuseries has put a spotlight on the unregulated world of sperm donation, particularly the lack of stopgap measures that might prevent donors who have been banned by one country from simply going elsewhere to donate more.
Released earlier...
By Rachel Clayton, ABC News | 07.08.2024
In her early 30s, Michelle Galea wasn't convinced motherhood was for her.
"I didn't know if I wanted a child or if society was telling me I should have a child right now," she said.
But as she watched two...
By Amanda Becker and Shefali Luthra, The 19th | 07.08.2024
Image by Duke University Archives from Flickr
Republicans have adopted a slate of policy positions ahead of next week’s convention that does not call for a federal legislative abortion ban, but opens the door to establishing fetal personhood.
The Republican...
By Beth Duff-Brown, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research | 07.12.2024
The debate over in vitro fertilization (IVF) has become a hot-button policy and political issue, despite the medical procedure to help people become pregnant having been mainstream in the United States for nearly half a century.
The Alabama Supreme Court ...