Letter to the editor regarding "At Birth, Tales of Joy and Heartbreak"
By Marcy Darnovsky,
New York Times
| 10. 14. 2009
To the Editor:
“The Gift of Life, and Its Price” reports that the fertility industry’s professional organization encourages its members to transfer fewer embryos, so as to produce fewer multiple pregnancies and premature babies. The organization, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, is to be commended for these efforts.
But its guidelines are routinely flouted. The society could put teeth behind its rules by publicly suspending the memberships of fertility practices in noncompliance. And it has resisted calls for public regulation and oversight.
Recent experiences with the financial sector have dramatized the dangers of inadequate public policy. The fertility industry, too, demonstrates the limits of self-regulation. Public regulation must be carefully written and not used to advance other agendas like opposition to reproductive rights. It’s past time for the federal government to set rules for the fertility industry and establish ways to enforce them.
Marcy Darnovsky
Berkeley, Calif., Oct. 11, 2009
The writer is associate executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society.
Related Articles
By Aileen Editha, The Conversation | 12.11.2024
By Staff, Reuters | 12.04.2024
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said on Wednesday it had entered into agreements with Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX.O), opens new tab and bluebird bio (BLUE.O), opens new tab to help increase patient access to their gene therapies.
The so-called...
By Staff, Center for Food Safety | 12.03.2024
Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash
SAN FRANCISCO—In a precedential victory for food and environmental safety, a federal district court ruled today that genetically engineered (GE) organisms must be regulated. The Court's ruling overturns the 2020 rule overhaul by the...
Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
It is hard to make predictions, especially about the future, as Yogi Berra, Niels Bohr, and other luminaries have remarked. But there are already signs that the incoming Trump administration may have some difficulty establishing consistent policies about controversial issues concerning human reproduction.
On the one hand, consider “the conservative blueprint for a second Trump administration.”
The notorious Project 2025’s Mandate for Leadership seeks to delete terms such as “reproductive rights” from “every federal...