A new age of genetic screening is coming — and we don’t have any rules for it
By Dalton Conley,
The Washington Post
| 06. 14. 2021
New ‘polygenic’ screening techniques open a Pandora’s Box of ethical issues.
After the coronavirus baby bust is over and fertility clinics are booming again, increasing numbers of new parents will bring home a generation of infants prescreened to perform better at school or basketball, resist heart disease or be less likely to have schizophrenia.
It may not be common yet, but the ability to screen embryos for any number of traits is here now, and improving every day. And this brave new world of genetic prediction I’m describing is not just about selecting babies during in vitro fertilization. It could also involve life insurance companies swabbing your cheek before issuing you a policy, preschools and colleges scoring your DNA as part of their admissions process and dating sites asking for your genetic profile before offering you a match.
But with this new technology comes countless ethical questions. Is embryo selection a good thing or a bad thing — or both? How do we balance potential inequities created against potential lives saved or improved? Do we want to keep genetics from becoming destiny, and what does that even mean? We desperately need...
Related Articles
By Gaia Ghirardi, Arno Van Hootegem & K. Paige Harden , Nature Human Behaviour | 09.21.2026
Embryo screening for behavioural traits is no longer speculative. If you want to become a parent in the USA today, you can pay to use pre-implantation polygenic testing (PGT-P) of in vitro fertilization (IVF)-created embryos. PGT-P promises to optimize offspring...
By Ann E. Marimow and J. David Goodman, The New York Times | 09.22.2026
Justice Elena Kagan on Tuesday refused to intervene in a high-profile custody battle that involved difficult questions surrounding surrogacy and abortion, leaving in place a lower-court order that gave custody to the biological parents in the dispute.
The case drew...
By Gay Pasley, Essence | 09.04.2026
That is what makes the unfolding case of McKenna West so important. It is more than a disagreement about abortion or a dispute over a surrogacy contract. It asks whether an agreement signed before a pregnancy can become authority...
By Ava Kofman, The New Yorker | 09.15.2026
A WOMAN WHO ACTS AS A SURROGATE, carrying a child for someone else, is said to be going on a “journey.”
Kayla Elliott started her surrogacy journey at the age of twenty-six. She gave birth to a baby girl for...