An Offshore Haven for Human Embryonic Stem-Cell Research?
By New England Journal of Medicine,
New England Journal of Medicine
| 10. 20. 2005
U.S. scientists studying human embryonic stem cells face unprecedented political, regulatory, and financial barriers created by the Bush administration's restrictive policies and by the ongoing national debate over the ethics of such research. The most promising method of making patient-specific and disease-specific embryonic stem-cell lines _ somatic-cell nuclear transfer _ is also the most ethically troubling for many people, because it requires both the creation of embryos for research purposes and the recruitment of women as egg donors. The procedure, in which the nucleus of a somatic cell is inserted into an oocyte, providing the genes for the development of an early-stage embryo, is not yet being performed in the United States.
(Figure)
Now, Woo Suk Hwang, the South Korean veterinarian and stem-cell biologist whose laboratory leads the world in the use of this technique, is planning to offer researchers in the United States and other countries a chance to work with such cell lines without having to make them themselves. Hwang's plan provides a possible strategy for accelerating international progress in the field and avoiding some of the legal...
Related Articles
By Aileen Editha, The Conversation | 12.11.2024
By Staff, Reuters | 12.04.2024
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said on Wednesday it had entered into agreements with Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX.O), opens new tab and bluebird bio (BLUE.O), opens new tab to help increase patient access to their gene therapies.
The so-called...
By Staff, Center for Food Safety | 12.03.2024
Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash
SAN FRANCISCO—In a precedential victory for food and environmental safety, a federal district court ruled today that genetically engineered (GE) organisms must be regulated. The Court's ruling overturns the 2020 rule overhaul by the...
Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
It is hard to make predictions, especially about the future, as Yogi Berra, Niels Bohr, and other luminaries have remarked. But there are already signs that the incoming Trump administration may have some difficulty establishing consistent policies about controversial issues concerning human reproduction.
On the one hand, consider “the conservative blueprint for a second Trump administration.”
The notorious Project 2025’s Mandate for Leadership seeks to delete terms such as “reproductive rights” from “every federal...