Opening the door to new high-tech eugenics is absolute folly
By Richard Hayes,
Financial Times
| 07. 18. 2018
The Nuffield Council’s approval of the creation of genetically modified children is inexcusable (“ Human gene editing morally permissible, says ethics study”, July 17). The most authoritative international agreement on human genetic technologies to date, the Council of Europe’s 1997 Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, prohibits heritable human genetic modification. The absolute folly of opening the door to new forms of high-tech eugenics, in a world already wracked with inequality and conflict, is self-evident to world leaders and to the average person on the street.
We can and should draw firm lines between the many benign, beneficent uses of genetic technology and those pernicious uses that would divide humanity against itself.
Dr. Richard Hayes
Executive Director Emeritus, Center for Genetics and Society, Berkeley, CA, US
###
Image via Max Pixel
Related Articles
By Staff, The Economist | 02.21.2025
One of the greatest scandals in modern science began with a late-2010s advertisement for HIV-positive couples looking to have children through in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). The ad had been put out by a scientist named He Jiankui, a biologist then at...
By Oriol Güell, El País | 02.17.2025
A “small strand of blood in the poop.” This was the first sign, initially viewed as unimportant, that put Jesús Lunar and Cristina López on the trail that something was happening with their son’s health. Javier had been born on...
By Ben Johnson, Nature | 02.14.2025
A London-based biotech has amassed the world’s largest ethically sourced foundational biodiversity database for training artificial intelligence (AI) by setting up partnerships with 25 countries around the world. The startup, Basecamp Research, announced in January the launch of a new...
By Tina Stevens and Stuart A. Newman, A Bigger Conversation | 02.06.2025