Potential Perils of DIY Genetic Testing
By Anna Salleh,
ABC News
| 09. 11. 2012
Being told you have a genetic predisposition to alcoholism could make you feel you have less control over your drinking, a new study suggests.
The unique study adds to growing concern about the potential perils of direct-to-consumer genetic tests.
Psychologist Dr Ilan Dar-Nimrod from the University of Sydney and colleagues report their findings in the journal Genetics in Medicine.
He says the latest findings show how genetic information has the power to change a person's emotional state, behaviour and attitudes.
"We have about 1600 genetic tests available now," says Dar-Nimrod. "We should have better knowledge about how to communicate these results in a manner that doesn't create harm."
He says for a few genetic-related diseases, having a particular gene means you will definitely get the disease, unless you die of other causes first.
But in 98 per cent of cases the gene only increases your risk of a condition and that risk may be very small or very uncertain.
Despite the lack of certainty around the impact of many disease-related genes, Dar-Nimrod says there is some evidence that people...
Related Articles
It’s been a busy couple of months in biopolitics, with developments in the US, UK, China, Japan, and implicitly on Mars. Time for a brief roundup.
• • •
Bioethics needs an update
The National Research Act is now 50 years old. It was signed into law on July 12, 1974, as a direct response to publicity about the 1932 “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male.” The Hastings Bioethics Forum celebrated its anniversary with an...
By Robert Resta, The DNA Exchange | 07.22.2024
Medical geneticists and genetic counselors have an often complicated and at times tense relationship with people with disabilities, their families, advocates, and scholars. Geneticists are strong advocates and supporters for all of their patients, regardless of their abilities and disabilities...
By Katherine Bourzac, Nature | 07.10.2024
Image courtesy National Human Genome Research Institute
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is supposed to encourage effective medical advances while also ensuring that patients and research subjects are protected. This dual mandate demands tricky judgment calls that are made more difficult by outside pressures of several kinds, political, judicial, and especially commercial. This April story at Bloomberg examines one deeply troubling pattern of regulatory capture:
Americans Are Paying Billions to Take Drugs That Don’t Work
Companies are increasingly...