Preventing the Next Fertility Clinic Scandal
By Jesse Reynolds,
Bioethics Forum
| 03. 13. 2009
Given the U.S. fertility industry's longstanding resistance to effective oversight, the field's two recent controversies - first octuplets, then an offer of embryo screening for cosmetic traits - shouldn't really come as a surprise. What was remarkable about the reaction they evoked from knowledgeable observers, in fact, was the chorus of agreement that it's time to leave the "Wild West" days of assisted reproduction behind.
The octuplets story turned many of us into reluctant voyeurs, fascinated by the daily dribble of details. Fortunately, at least some of the media attention soon turned away from the unsettling details about the babies' mother and focused instead on the fertility doctor involved. We soon learned that Michael Kamrava had not only transferred six embryos - two of which divided into twins - into the octuplets' mother, but had also recently put seven embryos into another woman who wanted only one child, leaving her pregnant with quadruplets.
The industry that had tolerated such irresponsible medical conduct also came under much-needed scrutiny. Many people were surprised to learn that the multibillion dollar American fertility industry...
Related Articles
By Aileen Editha, The Conversation | 12.11.2024
By Staff, Reuters | 12.04.2024
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said on Wednesday it had entered into agreements with Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX.O), opens new tab and bluebird bio (BLUE.O), opens new tab to help increase patient access to their gene therapies.
The so-called...
By Staff, Center for Food Safety | 12.03.2024
Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash
SAN FRANCISCO—In a precedential victory for food and environmental safety, a federal district court ruled today that genetically engineered (GE) organisms must be regulated. The Court's ruling overturns the 2020 rule overhaul by the...
Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
It is hard to make predictions, especially about the future, as Yogi Berra, Niels Bohr, and other luminaries have remarked. But there are already signs that the incoming Trump administration may have some difficulty establishing consistent policies about controversial issues concerning human reproduction.
On the one hand, consider “the conservative blueprint for a second Trump administration.”
The notorious Project 2025’s Mandate for Leadership seeks to delete terms such as “reproductive rights” from “every federal...