Should Research Subjects Be Given Their Genetic Test Results?
By Margaret Lutze,
Guardian Liberty Voice
| 06. 12. 2014
Untitled Document
Should research subjects be given their genetic test results? A paper recently published in The American Journal of Human Genetics considered the ethical issues related to returning genetic testing results to people who have participated in research experiments.
There is a growing number of research projects that use next-generation DNA sequencing to determine the sequence of the DNA nucleotides (ATCGs) in a person’s entire genome. Next-generation sequencing is a new technique that allows DNA sequencing information for an individual to be gathered very quickly. Previously, only certain chosen areas of a person’s genome would be sequenced for a research study due to time and efficiency constraints. Now, however, with the efficiency of next-generation sequencing, it is cost- and time-effective to sequence everything, meaning all the DNA of that person.
The ethical dilemma that results from this is the fact that the research scientist now has information about all of the research subject’s genes, and there may be something in their genetic make-up that would be medically significant for that person. The question is, since the research scientist may now have...
Related Articles
By Pallab Gosh and Gwyndaf Hughes, BBC News | 06.26.2025
Work has begun on a controversial project to create the building blocks of human life from scratch, in what is believed to be a world first.
The research has been taboo until now because of concerns it could lead to...
Since the “CRISPR babies” scandal in 2018, no additional genetically modified babies are known to have been born. Now several techno-enthusiastic billionaires are setting up privately funded companies to genetically edit human embryos, with the explicit intention of creating genetically modified children.
Heritable genome editing remains prohibited by policies in the overwhelming majority of countries that have any relevant policy, and by a binding European treaty. Support for keeping it legally off limits is widespread, including among scientists...
By Ron Leuty, San Francisco Business Times | 06.16.2025
23andMe's two-step sale to a nonprofit led by former CEO Anne Wojcicki is nothing more than a dance around California's genetic privacy law, state Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a filing late Monday, one day before a judge will...
By Ed Cara, Gizmodo | 06.22.2025
In late May, several scientific organizations, including the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT), banded together to call for a 10-year moratorium on using CRISPR and related technologies to pursue human heritable germline editing. The declaration also outlined...