Should We Use Gene Editing to Create Super Babies?
By Staff [cites CGS' Katie Hasson],
The New York Times Upfront
| 02. 17. 2025
A young couple wants to have a baby, but they’re worried it’ll carry a disease that runs in the family. “There’s a solution,” the doctor says, “a technology that can alter the disease-causing gene in the egg, ensuring that the baby is born healthy.”
“How about giving our child blue eyes and musical talent?” the parents ask. “I think I can help you,” the doctor says.
Such a conversation once belonged only in the realm of science fiction. But with advances in gene-editing technologies such as CRISPR, fiction might become reality. In 2018, a doctor in China announced that he’d used CRISPR to edit twin girls’ DNA to protect them against the AIDS virus.
But not everyone thinks the world is ready for all the implications of tinkering with human genes. For instance, who’d get to decide which traits should be changed? And aren’t the traits we’re born with part of who we are? In a recent Pew Research Center study, about half of Americans agreed that it was “meddling with nature” and “a line we should...
Related Articles
By Jared Whitlock, Endpoints News | 10.09.2025
When Nirnay Murthy learned about a treatment for his toddler son’s rare condition, relief quickly gave way to disappointment.
A one-time gene therapy called Zolgensma from the Swiss drugmaker Novartis can halt spinal muscular atrophy, a deadly condition that causes...
By Meagan Parrish, PharmaVoice | 10.10.2025
When CEO Ben Lamm steps into the spotlight, it’s usually to talk about his efforts bringing extinct animals back to life. Once a far-flung idea, Lamm and the company he heads, Colossal Biosciences, have proven they can pull it off...
By Rob Stein, NPR | 09.30.2025
Scientists have created human eggs containing genes from adult skin cells, a step that someday could help women who are infertile or gay couples have babies with their own genes but would also raise difficult ethical, social and legal issues...
By Daniel Hildebrand, The Humanist | 10.01.2025
When most people hear the word eugenics, they think of dusty history textbooks and black-and-white photographs: forced sterilizations in the early 20th century, pseudoscientific charts measuring skulls, the language of “fitness” used to justify violence and exclusion. It feels like...