Social science: Include social equity in California Biohub
By Science FARE (Feminist Anti-Racist Equity) Collective: Jessica Cussins, Kate Weatherford Darling, Ugo Edu, Laura Mamo, Jenny Reardon & Charis Thompson,
Nature
| 10. 19. 2016
We have an idea for philanthropists Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg, who last month announced their first major investment in basic science: US$600 million for a Biohub in San Francisco, California.
They aspire to 'advance human potential and promote equality' (https://chanzuckerberg.com). As members of the Science FARE (Feminist Anti-Racist Equity) collective, we suggest that 5–7% of the Biohub's health-research budget should be used to design and monitor goals of justice and equality from the outset. Otherwise, social inequalities could limit the project's potential.
Innovative social scientists will need to work with bench scientists, engineers and clinical researchers. Health research should include trained people from all social backgrounds and a variety of disciplines.
The affordability of treatments and access to them is crucial, irrespective of class, gender, race or disabilities. Building equality into Biohub's founding architecture will allow it to be tackled simultaneously with disease eradication, mitigating the uneven social distribution of health care in San Francisco's Bay Area and beyond.
Image via C-Z BioHub
Related Articles
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 11.24.2024
Gig work in childcare, nursing, and transportation; non-invasive prenatal testing; gene editing; and space expeditions can all be attributed to one mistaken, pervasive assumption: that “we can innovate our way out of the thorniest problems, including reproductive ones” (22). In Reproductive Labor and Innovation: Against the Tech Fix in an Era of Hype, feminist political theorist Jennifer Denbow demonstrates why the U.S. has put so much of its hopes, and its money, on technological “innovations”––and why that hasn’t addressed...
By Tamsin Metelerkamp, Daily Maverick | 11.18.2024
The National Health Research Ethics Council (NHREC) has confirmed that heritable human genome editing (HHGE) remains illegal in South Africa, after changes in the latest version of the South African Ethics in Health Research Guidelines sparked concern among researchers that...
By World Health Organization, World Health Organization | 11.20.2024
By Bernice Lottering, Gene Online | 11.08.2024
South Africa’s updated health-research ethics guidelines, which now include heritable human genome editing, have sparked concern among scientists. The revisions, made in May but only recently gaining attention, outline protocols for modifying genetic material in sperm, eggs, or embryos—changes that...