Supreme Court Backs DNA Collection in Arrests
By Michael Fitzhugh,
The Burrill Report
| 06. 28. 2013
[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]
A divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police may take and analyze DNA samples from anyone arrested for a “serious offense” as part of the gathering of forensic evidence. The decision in Maryland v. King split the justices 5-4 in support of allowing DNA collection during routine police bookings.
...
The American Civil Liberties Union characterized the decision “a blow to genetic privacy.” Appraising the ruling on the ACLU’s blog, Northern California staff attorney Michael Risher wrote that the ruling allows police to seize DNA of innocent Americans without a search warrant.
Scalia makes clear, says Risher, that “the majority opinion goes against decades of precedent that makes it clear that the police cannot search an individual for evidence of a crime (and that’s clearly what they are doing here) without a specific reason to think that the search will actually uncover some evidence.”
While technological limitations today may slow the development of a functional
national DNA database, Scalia writes in his dissent that the ruling would move the nation toward one. “Make no mistake about it: As an entirely...
Related Articles
A Review of Exposed by Becky McClain
“Do not get lost in a sea of despair. Be hopeful, be optimistic. Our struggle is not the struggle of a day, a week, a month, or a year, it is the struggle of a lifetime. Never, ever be afraid to make some noise and get in good trouble, necessary trouble.”
— John Lewis
Becky McClain became famous when she successfully sued Pfizer, one of the very largest pharmaceutical and biotech companies. She...
By Katherine Long, Ben Foldy, and Lingling Wei, The Wall Street Journal | 12.13.2025
Inside a closed Los Angeles courtroom, something wasn’t right.
Clerks working for family court Judge Amy Pellman were reviewing routine surrogacy petitions when they spotted an unusual pattern: the same name, again and again.
A Chinese billionaire was seeking parental...
By Sarah Kliff, The New York Times | 12.10.2025
Micah Nerio had known since his early 30s that he wanted to be a father, even if he did not have a partner. He spent a decade saving up to pursue surrogacy, an expensive process where he would create embryos...
By Carter Sherman, The Guardian | 12.08.2025
A huge defense policy bill, revealed by US lawmakers on Sunday, does not include a provision that would have provided broad healthcare coverage for in vitro fertilization (IVF) for active-duty members of the military, despite Donald Trump’s pledge...
