Vertex Fails to Convince UK Watchdog of CRISPR Therapy Casgevy’s Value
By Nick Paul Taylor,
BioSpace
| 03. 14. 2024
A U.K. watchdog balked at the cost-effectiveness of Vertex Pharmaceuticals’ CRISPR-based sickle cell disease therapy Thursday, recommending against funding the treatment unless uncertainties can be cleared up satisfactorily.
The U.K. became the first country to authorize Vertex’s Casgevy (exagamglogene autotemcel) when the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency approved the treatment in November 2023. However, regulatory approval is just the first of two key steps to reaching patients in the U.K. Vertex must also show the therapy is cost-effective before it can be used routinely by the National Health Service (NHS).
The U.K. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended against the use of Casgevy in sickle cell disease in draft guidance. The therapy has a list price of $2.2 million in the U.S. but NICE’s guidance says the U.K. price is “commercial in confidence.” Vertex’s justification for the cost rests on the potential for a one-time treatment with Casgevy to provide a functional cure for sickle cell disease.
Currently, NICE’s cost-effectiveness estimate for Casgevy exceeds the threshold it normally views as a good use of the...
Related Articles
By Peter Wehling, Tino Plümecke, and Isabelle Bartram
| 03.26.2025
This article was originally published as “Soziogenomik und polygene Scores” in issue 272 (February 2025) of the German-language journal Gen-ethischer Informationsdienst (GID); translated by the authors.
In mid-November 2024, the British organization Hope not Hate published its investigative research ‘Inside the Eugenics Revival’. In addition to documentating an active international “race research” network, the investigation also brought to light the existence of a US start-up that offers eugenic embryo selection. Heliospect Genomics aims to enable wealthy couples to...
By Dalton Conley, The New York Times | 03.13.2025
Since Francis Galton coined the phrase “nature versus nurture” 150 years ago, the debate about what makes us who we are has dominated the human sciences.
Do genes determine our destiny, as the hereditarians would say? Or do we enter...
By Jamie Ducharme, TIME | 03.06.2025
After struggling for eight years to have a baby, Shannon Petersen and her husband decided to try in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 2022. Their fertility doctor recommended a test that sounded like exactly what they needed. It promised to help...
By Jason Wilson, The Guardian | 03.03.2025
A natalist conference featuring speakers including self-described eugenicists and promoters of race science, apparently including the man behind a previously pseudonymous race-science influencer account, and the founder of a startup offering IQ screening for IVF embryos, will be held at...