We Call DNA a Language. Is It?
By Luke Shors,
Neo.Life
| 12. 10. 2020
Fifty years before we solved it, long before its information began filling scientific headlines and pharmaceutical shelves, and even before we understood the basic fact that DNA is a double helix, the human genome was being framed as a type of language. In 1952, the physicist Edwin Schrödinger turned an eye towards biology. He was already famous for his work in quantum mechanics, including postulating his famous eponymous cat, which sat alone in a box, both alive and dead, until you looked inside the box to see if it was one or the other. He was influential in biology as well, postulating that there must be a code script contained in DNA bases connected by covalent bonds that was capable of transmitting heredity information.
From the very beginning of our nearly 75-year love affair with this gooey substance, DNA was discussed as a language. And if DNA was the language, then the genome was the book—not just a container, but a manual. DNA began to be called the language of life, and many thought if we could read it...
Related Articles
By Anumita Kaur [cites CGS’ Katie Hasson], The Washington Post | 03.25.2025
Genetic information company 23andMe has said that it is headed to bankruptcy court, raising questions for what happens to the DNA shared by millions of people with the company via saliva test kits.
Sunday’s announcement clears the way for a new...
By Peter Wehling, Tino Plümecke, and Isabelle Bartram
| 03.26.2025
This article was originally published as “Soziogenomik und polygene Scores” in issue 272 (February 2025) of the German-language journal Gen-ethischer Informationsdienst (GID); translated by the authors.
In mid-November 2024, the British organization Hope not Hate published its investigative research ‘Inside the Eugenics Revival’. In addition to documentating an active international “race research” network, the investigation also brought to light the existence of a US start-up that offers eugenic embryo selection. Heliospect Genomics aims to enable wealthy couples to...
By Frank Landymore, Futurism | 03.18.2025
You can only throw so much money at a problem.
This, more or less, is the line being taken by AI researchers in a recent survey. Asked whether "scaling up" current AI approaches could lead to achieving artificial general...
By Craig S. Smith, Forbes | 03.08.2025
One recent evening in Shenzhen, a group of software engineers gathered in a dimly lit co-working space, furiously typing as they monitored the performance of a new AI system. The air was electric, thick with the hum of servers and...