What does Brexit mean for bioethics?
By Xavier Symons,
BioEdge
| 06. 25. 2016
It is tempting to provide an alarmist answer to this question. Yet it is wise to avoid the apocalyptic tone of recent media coverage and first to flag what is not going to change in UK biomedical ethics policy.
As highlighted by a post on the Christian Medical Fellowship Blogs, the UK will not (or, at least, not yet) be leaving the Council of Europe (CoE) – this entity does not fall under the auspices of the EU. That the UK will remain in the CoE is significant, as this is the umbrella organisation for what is known as the Committee on Bioethics, an influential policy body that seeks to apply principles outlined in the Convention on Human Rights and Medicine to new issues in medical technology and research.
The European Court on Human Rights also falls within the purview of the CoE. Importantly, The ECHR has handed down significant decisions within the area of conscientious objection in healthcare.
Yet some suggest the Brexit vote may effect disability rights legislation and regulations in the UK. EU directives about...
Related Articles
By Peter Wehling, Tino Plümecke, and Isabelle Bartram
| 03.26.2025
This article was originally published as “Soziogenomik und polygene Scores” in issue 272 (February 2025) of the German-language journal Gen-ethischer Informationsdienst (GID); translated by the authors.
In mid-November 2024, the British organization Hope not Hate published its investigative research ‘Inside the Eugenics Revival’. In addition to documentating an active international “race research” network, the investigation also brought to light the existence of a US start-up that offers eugenic embryo selection. Heliospect Genomics aims to enable wealthy couples to...
After almost 20 years of publicity stunts and dubious claims, we may not have 23andMe to kick around anymore. The company has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The stock has collapsed to about 2% of its peak value. CEO and co-founder Anne Wojcicki has quit (though she may be baaack) and the company’s future, if any, depends on its DNA database.
Note to customers of the company: Get Out. Cybersecurity expert Adrianus Warmenhoven told the Associated Press...
By ACLU Northern California
| 03.21.2025
In a long-standing lawsuit, the ACLU, on behalf of partner organizations and an individual taxpayer, is challenging the state of California for its retention of genetic samples and profiles from people arrested but never convicted of a felony.
The complaint...
By Loren Johnston, Portland Press Herald | 03.15.2025
