What Kind of Bioethics Council Do We Need?
By Marcy Darnovsky,
Science Progress
| 08. 17. 2009
Science Tells Us What We Can Do; Values Tell Us What We Should
Bioethics councils have come in many shapes and sizes, with different mandates, memberships, and outcomes. What kind of bioethics council would best serve the nation now? How can we move beyond the rancor and polarization-not to mention hyperbole and distortions on all sides-that in recent years have characterized so much of bioethics and the broader politics of science? There is no one answer, but a new council must incorporate viewpoints from Americans of all walks of life, maintain an appropriate distance from both scientific and commercial interests, and build on the experience of other nations.
President Obama's leadership on stem cell policies and politics begins to show a way forward. The President opened the remarks that accompanied his March executive order loosening restrictions on federal funding of embryonic stem cell research by invoking the work's great promise, and then immediately moved on to warn against overstating its potential. He noted the "difficult and delicate balance" between "sound science and moral values." He pledged that research supported by the federal government would be "both scientifically worthy and responsibly conducted" according to...
Related Articles
By Aileen Editha, The Conversation | 12.11.2024
By Staff, Reuters | 12.04.2024
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said on Wednesday it had entered into agreements with Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX.O), opens new tab and bluebird bio (BLUE.O), opens new tab to help increase patient access to their gene therapies.
The so-called...
By Staff, Center for Food Safety | 12.03.2024
Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash
SAN FRANCISCO—In a precedential victory for food and environmental safety, a federal district court ruled today that genetically engineered (GE) organisms must be regulated. The Court's ruling overturns the 2020 rule overhaul by the...
Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
It is hard to make predictions, especially about the future, as Yogi Berra, Niels Bohr, and other luminaries have remarked. But there are already signs that the incoming Trump administration may have some difficulty establishing consistent policies about controversial issues concerning human reproduction.
On the one hand, consider “the conservative blueprint for a second Trump administration.”
The notorious Project 2025’s Mandate for Leadership seeks to delete terms such as “reproductive rights” from “every federal...