What next for human gene therapy?
By Eric T. Juengst,
British Medical Journal
| 06. 28. 2003
The high hope of genetic medicine for 30 years has been to develop a way of using recombinant DNA techniques to treat patients through the genes involved in their diseases. As Richard Roblin, scientific director of the Council on Bioethics of the President of the United States, put it in 1979: "There is something aesthetically compelling about cutting to the heart of the problem, by treating the disease at the molecular level, where it originates."1 Since 1990, this vision has generated a modest industry of bench research and animal studies, culminating in almost 1000 clinical trials in humans around the world, for a wide variety of diseases.2 In the past few years, however, the field has learned that in genetic medicine, as in war, the "surgical strike" is rarely as clean and effective as theory implies it should be.
After almost a decade without much clinical success,3 the field has experienced in quick succession its first iatrogenic death,4 its first apparent "cures,"5 and then among those cured patients the first instances of serious downstream disease traceable to the main theoretical...
Related Articles
By Garrett Owen, Salon | 03.18.2026
By Ritsuko Kawai, Wired | 03.14.2026
On March 6, Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare officially granted conditional and time-limited marketing authorization to two regenerative medical products derived from reprogrammed iPS cells, marking exactly 20 years since the creation of mouse iPS cells.These will...
By Margaret R. Eby, Los Angeles Review of Books | 03.15.2026
By Antonia O'Flaherty, ABC News Australia | 03.04.2026
Fertility giant Monash IVF has agreed to pay financial settlements to families involved in two major bungles that saw two women transferred the wrong embryo.
In February 2025 the company became aware that one of its Brisbane clinic's patients had...