Racial Justice

Biologists and social scientists agree that race is a social category, not a biological or genetic one. Yet the idea that genetic lines can be drawn between racial groups continues to make its way into human genetic research and biotechnologies. Examples can be found in some genetic studies on racialized health disparities, direct-to-consumer genetic ancestry tests, and race-specific drugs. These products and practices are both inaccurate and socially pernicious when they reduce race to a set of biological markers and fail to address racism and the social, political, environmental, and economic inequalities that continue to make race a salient social category. 


Aggregated News

Law, Africana-studies, and sociology professor Dorothy Roberts describes race as a “political category that has been disguised as a biological one.” It’s a hard concept for many to grasp. Physical features associated with race, such as skin and hair color...

Biopolitical Times

You may have recently seen an AncestryDNA ad that ran during the 2018 Winter Olympics. The video features a young white female figure skater gliding around the rink. A voice-over narration tells us,

Greatness lives within all of us. And with AncestryDNA on sale for just $69, now is the time to discover yours. You can find out where you get your precision (cue onscreen pie chart graphic: ‘Scandinavia 48%’), your grace (‘27% Central Asia’), your drive (‘21% Great Britain’)...

Biopolitical Times
We are in a moment of extreme challenge for each of us and for our country's future – yet again...
Biopolitical Times

Image of Sonoma State Home, site of the highest number of eugenic sterilizations in California, courtesy of Alexandra Minna Stern...

Aggregated News

Report from the Gender and Justice in the Gene Age Conference

Submitted by admin on

Gender and Justice in the Gene Age, an invitational feminist meeting on the social implications of new reproductive and genetic technologies, took place on May 6 and 7 in New York City. This was the first U.S. meeting in many years to ground these issues in the values and commitments of feminists who work from a global social justice and human rights perspective.

Some sixty-five participants from feminist, disability, women's health, social justice and racial justice organizations, including activists and academics, of all ages, attended. Most were from the U.S., but an important several came from Latin America, India, Canada, the UK, and Germany.

Gender and Justice in the Gene Age was co-sponsored by CGS; the Committee on Women, Population and the Environment; and Our Bodies Ourselves. The meeting website, http://www.GJGA.org, is now a public resource.

Update: The conference website now contains an in-depth report [PDF], as of May 2005.

Gender and Justice in the Gene Age closed with discussion about strategies for mobilizing concern among feminists, building stronger bridges among feminist and disability organizations and communities, communicating a social justice feminist perspective on reproductive genetics to other constituencies, working with media to insert that perspective into the larger public and policy debates, and more.

CGS is very pleased to announce that as part of these efforts, we will be establishing a new program, the Project on Gender, Justice and Human Genetics, to focus on the social and political implications of reproductive and genetic technologies. The program will be headed by Sujatha Jesudason, who comes to CGS from her position as Lead Movement Organizer at Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice. A full report on the meeting, and more information about this new CGS project, are forthcoming.

Is Op-Ed
Off
Category
Date
2004-07-09T12:00:00
Source
Genetic Crossroads

CGS-authored

Press Statement

Aggregated News

Published September 26, 2023

Emily Galpern speaks at the Black Women for Wellness Reproductive Justice Conference in August 2023 about deep disparities between the people most directly affected by state control of reproduction and those with privilege who can access privatized, high-cost fertility services to form their families.

Published September 21, 2022

How should we talk about equity in the context of human genome editing? While sky-high costs and lack of access to potential somatic gene therapies are important to address, we also need to ask critical questions about health equity, sovereignty, and racial justice––particularly in relation to heritable genome editing, which would alter the genes and traits of future generations. This roundtable discussion with Indigenous geneticist-bioethicist Krystal Tsosie, reproductive justice scholar and advocate Dorothy Roberts, and educator and activist Milton Reynolds addresses the legacies of eugenics, honoring Indigenous sovereignty, decolonizing DNA, and why conversations about heritable genome editing urgently need voices and perspectives grounded in social justice and human rights. This discussion was hosted by Center for Genetics and Society and moderated by CGS associate director Katie Hasson.

Access a full transcript and learn more about the event and speakers at https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/in....

Published March 31, 2023

The third panel in CGS' Missing Voices Initiative webinar series, this roundtable conversation explored the perilous prospect of reproductive uses of human genome editing from the perspective of feminist and reproductive justice scholars and advocates. Their intersectional analyses illuminated concerns related to eugenics and the rapidly expanding global fertility industry. Speakers were Kavita Ramdas, Alana Cattapan, and Amrita Pande, and the panel was moderated by Susan Berke Fogel.

Find more information about the panel's speakers here: https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/in...

Learn more about CGS' Missing Voices Initiative here: https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/in...