Opinion: ADA and the new eugenics
By Andrew J. Imparato and Anne C. Sommers,
Washington Examiner
| 08. 10. 2005
With the mapping of the human genome, potential for improving the quality of life for people with painful and degenerative conditions has brought new hope in many circles. To be sure, the prospect of cures and disease prevention has widespread appeal. Yet are we ready to use genetic engineering to prevent the birth of any baby with Down syndrome, dwarfism or genetic forms of deafness or mental health conditions? What about genetic predispositions for cancer or Alzheimer's disease? Who decides?
Last month America marked the 15th anniversary of the signing of the Americans with Disabilities Act, a landmark civil rights law recognizing that disability is a natural part of human diversity that in no way should limit a person's right to make choices, pursue meaningful careers and participate fully in all aspects of society.
The ADA stands in marked contrast to some deeply troubling U.S. history that some in today's biotechnology industry and many bioethicists have not completely abandoned.
At the turn of the 20th century, the cousin of Charles Darwin, Francis Galton, launched a pseudo-scientific movement known as "eugenics"...
Related Articles
By Justin McCurry, The Guardian | 07.03.2024
Photo by Roméo A. on Unsplash
Japan’s supreme court has ordered the government to pay damages to dozens of people who were forcibly sterilised under a now-defunct eugenics law, saying the practice had violated their constitutional rights.
Wednesday’s ruling by...
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 07.11.2024
Louise Perry’s recent article in The Spectator cautions against “The quiet return of eugenics,” a threat she locates in preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic disorders. The technology is billed as a way for parents undergoing IVF to select which embryo to implant based on information about each embryo’s genetic risk factors and traits. These reports, she says, give parents “a very full picture of the adult that embryo could become”––from their child’s risk of developing different diseases to their “likely...
By Shivam Jadaun and Shivani, JURISTnews | 06.27.2024
Image by European Council from Flickr
In some European Union nations, the forced sterilisation of people with disabilities is still a widespread and concerning practice that blatantly violates their fundamental rights and human dignity. The scope of forced sterilisation in...