Ad Campaign Fuels Debate On Breast-Cancer Gene Test
By Marilyn Chase,
Wall Street Journal
| 09. 11. 2007
A new direct-to-consumer ad campaign for a breast-cancer gene test is reigniting a debate over who really needs the test and whether it will induce low-risk women to take drastic measures to prevent the disease.
At issue is a series of ads to promote Myriad Genetics Inc.'s test for so-called BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 gene mutations. The mutations, while rare, signal a high risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer in affected women. Women who find they carry the mutations often take steps to lessen their risk. That can mean more frequent screenings and taking certain preventive drugs, but also can include prophylactic surgical removal of a woman's breasts or ovaries.
The gene tests aren't foolproof, however. And some experts worry that a campaign calling attention to a rare condition could create unnecessary fear -- sending thousands of healthy women with no family history of cancer into the doctor's office demanding tests that won't help them. Or lead others to a false sense of security about their results.
"Marketing has the capacity to raise public awareness -- a good...
Related Articles
By Editorial Staff, The Guardian | 07.05.2026
Ever since Crispr-Cas9 gene-editing technology emerged in the early 2010s, ethical questions around genetically altered humans, so-called designer babies, have become increasingly urgent. There is already a worldwide legal prohibition. No country currently allows human germline editing (meaning genetic changes...
By Sarah Norcross, Sandy Starr, Amanda Cooney, and Anneliese Burton, BioNews | 07.06.2026
By Anna Louie Sussman, The New York Times | 07.01.2026
Birthrates in much of the developed world are at record lows, but there’s one demographic group that’s exploring new frontiers of fertility: ultrawealthy men. Deploying nearly limitless resources, a small number of them are reproducing at such an extraordinary scale...
By Emily Baumgaertner Nunn, The New York Times | 06.11.2026
When scientists at Columbia University announced they had used a newer technology to precisely edit the genes of human embryos last week, they set the academic community ablaze with debate. Is this good news or bad? How fast will...