DNA Samples Stir Doubts but Police Detectives Find Them Invaluable
By Natasha Robinson,
The Australian
| 09. 29. 2014
Untitled Document
IN inner-city Sydney, a man in his 50s answers an unexpected knock at the front door. It’s the police, carrying a DNA sample kit and some paperwork. A document explains to the man that he has been classified as an untested former offender, empowering the police to collect his DNA.
The document means little to the disability support pensioner, who is illiterate. But he does notice that his name is spelled incorrectly and his date of birth is wrong.
“He explained that he couldn’t read the letter,” says the man’s lawyer, Redfern Legal Service police powers solicitor David Porter. “But we can surmise on the basis of what the police used in their letter that he had never served a sentence for a violent offence.
“It had been a number of years since he had come into contact with police. His last period of imprisonment was 15 years ago.”
This year in NSW alone, hundreds of people have had similar knocks on the door from police officers seeking a sample of their DNA via a mouth swab. It...
Related Articles
By Pallab Gosh and Gwyndaf Hughes, BBC News | 06.26.2025
Work has begun on a controversial project to create the building blocks of human life from scratch, in what is believed to be a world first.
The research has been taboo until now because of concerns it could lead to...
Since the “CRISPR babies” scandal in 2018, no additional genetically modified babies are known to have been born. Now several techno-enthusiastic billionaires are setting up privately funded companies to genetically edit human embryos, with the explicit intention of creating genetically modified children.
Heritable genome editing remains prohibited by policies in the overwhelming majority of countries that have any relevant policy, and by a binding European treaty. Support for keeping it legally off limits is widespread, including among scientists...
By Ron Leuty, San Francisco Business Times | 06.16.2025
23andMe's two-step sale to a nonprofit led by former CEO Anne Wojcicki is nothing more than a dance around California's genetic privacy law, state Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a filing late Monday, one day before a judge will...
By Ed Cara, Gizmodo | 06.22.2025
In late May, several scientific organizations, including the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT), banded together to call for a 10-year moratorium on using CRISPR and related technologies to pursue human heritable germline editing. The declaration also outlined...
