Ethical Overkill: Institutions should take a unified look at protections for research on human subjects
By Editorial,
Nature
| 12. 09. 2014
The most important resource needed to conduct research on humans, it is said, is not brainpower or money: it is trust. In the United States, as elsewhere, hundreds of institutions and thousands of investigators work to protect that trust by carefully evaluating proposals for clinical trials and other research that uses human subjects.
Each US institution hosting such a study typically conducts its own ethical review of the proposal. The review process serves many functions: it is an expression of the responsibility that these investigators feel towards protecting their local community, an opportunity to tweak protocols to adapt to the community’s specific needs, and a protection against potential lawsuits resulting from a flawed research protocol.
Sadly, evidence suggests that much of this effort is misplaced. A 2010 survey of 45 institutions reviewing the same protocol found that local scrutiny resulted in no substantial changes (B. Ravina et al. Ann. Neurol. 67, 258–260; 2010). Instead, most alterations simply inserted standardized institutional language — unrelated to the proposed study — to the informed-consent document signed by research participants before they...
Related Articles
By Tomoko Otake, The Japan Times | 04.09.2024
A decade ago, researcher Haruko Obokata caused a sensation when she published two papers in the journal Nature, in which she claimed that she had discovered a way to create stem cells easily using the so-called STAP method.
With STAP...
By Yelena Biberman and Jonathan D. Moreno, Bioethics Forum | 04.16.2024
A quiet biological revolution in warfare is underway. The genome is emerging as a new domain of conflict. The level of destruction that only nuclear weapons could previously achieve is fast becoming as accessible as a cyberattack.
Now for the...
CGS is excited to announce the launch of a new anti-eugenics initiative that has been years in the making. Legacies of Eugenics in Science, Medicine, and Technology kicks off with a monthly essay series published at the Los Angeles Review of Books that will expose and contest the reemergence of eugenic ideas in contemporary health sciences, human biotechnology, public health, and medicine. Community and campus-based events featuring the authors are also being planned. The project is a collaboration among CGS...
By Tristan Manalac, BioSpace | 04.02.2024
Verve Therapeutics has suspended enrollment in the Phase Ib Heart-1 study evaluating its lead gene editing program VERVE-101 following a serious adverse event, the company announced Tuesday.
A patient, who received a 0.45-mg/kg dose of VERVE-101, developed a grade 3...