Could Genetically Engineered Humans Become a Reality?
By Robert King,
Washington Examiner
| 04. 30. 2015
[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]
Untitled Document
Science is closer to creating genetically engineered human beings, and the advances in technology are sparking ethical arguments over making "a new kind of person."
The National Institutes of Health said Wednesday it would not fund any research into the gene editing of human embryos. The decision comes after Chinese researchers announced last week results from the first study to edit human embryo genes.
Gene editing, as the term implies, enables a scientist to cut DNA from a genome and insert it into another genome.
Theoretically an edited human embryo could then be implanted in a woman's uterus.
The goal is to edit the group of cells called the germline that could hand down diseases from one generation to the next. Researchers hope to prevent inherited diseases such as cystic fibrosis or sickle cell anemia from being passed on from a parent to a child.
The Chinese study was not successful. Scientists missed targets to place the DNA and discovered unknown mutations to cells.
However, the experiment has renewed talk in the scientific community of whether such research...
Related Articles
By Aileen Editha, The Conversation | 12.11.2024
By Staff, Reuters | 12.04.2024
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said on Wednesday it had entered into agreements with Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX.O), opens new tab and bluebird bio (BLUE.O), opens new tab to help increase patient access to their gene therapies.
The so-called...
By Staff, Center for Food Safety | 12.03.2024
Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash
SAN FRANCISCO—In a precedential victory for food and environmental safety, a federal district court ruled today that genetically engineered (GE) organisms must be regulated. The Court's ruling overturns the 2020 rule overhaul by the...
Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
It is hard to make predictions, especially about the future, as Yogi Berra, Niels Bohr, and other luminaries have remarked. But there are already signs that the incoming Trump administration may have some difficulty establishing consistent policies about controversial issues concerning human reproduction.
On the one hand, consider “the conservative blueprint for a second Trump administration.”
The notorious Project 2025’s Mandate for Leadership seeks to delete terms such as “reproductive rights” from “every federal...