Over-Optimistic Portrayal of Life-Supporting Treatments in Newspapers and Internet
By Thaddeus Pope,
Medical Futility Blog
| 08. 09. 2014
Several Taiwanese researchers have
just published a new study: "Over-Optimistic Portrayal of Life-Supporting Treatments in Newspapers and on the Internet: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation as an Example."
From the article's conclusion: Newspapers and the Internet have the potential to influence patients' knowledge and attitudes toward medical decision-making by providing over-optimistic medical information through the following ways:
- First, the mass media tend to attract the public’s attention by reporting the positive outcome of an important breakthrough in clinical medicine
- Second, the mass media tend to report patients who survive to hospital discharge, rather than those who die during hospital stay
- Third, the survived patients and their stories are more likely to be duplicated in newspapers and on Internet web pages than those who die during hospital stay.
Newspaper readers and Internet users may, therefore, mistakenly believe that ECMO can usually rescue patients from all life-threatening conditions. However, ECMO, similar to other aggressive LST such as CPR, is ethically appropriate to be initiated on patients with
reversible diseases, not on those with irreversible diseases.
Related Articles
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 11.24.2024
Gig work in childcare, nursing, and transportation; non-invasive prenatal testing; gene editing; and space expeditions can all be attributed to one mistaken, pervasive assumption: that “we can innovate our way out of the thorniest problems, including reproductive ones” (22). In Reproductive Labor and Innovation: Against the Tech Fix in an Era of Hype, feminist political theorist Jennifer Denbow demonstrates why the U.S. has put so much of its hopes, and its money, on technological “innovations”––and why that hasn’t addressed...
By Tamsin Metelerkamp, Daily Maverick | 11.18.2024
The National Health Research Ethics Council (NHREC) has confirmed that heritable human genome editing (HHGE) remains illegal in South Africa, after changes in the latest version of the South African Ethics in Health Research Guidelines sparked concern among researchers that...
By World Health Organization, World Health Organization | 11.20.2024
By Bernice Lottering, Gene Online | 11.08.2024
South Africa’s updated health-research ethics guidelines, which now include heritable human genome editing, have sparked concern among scientists. The revisions, made in May but only recently gaining attention, outline protocols for modifying genetic material in sperm, eggs, or embryos—changes that...